> Dr. E: I didn't read the long article, but I just wanted to say...
InkyPinkie: I do the same, if there is an article, one must just pick out one or two words and then one can make one's comments. How this kind of exchange works we can learn in its perfection from the chat groups, there one must only throw one word into the chat room, two might already be too much and then somebody else will answer with a word. But there is something more advanced we can learn from chat groups: They don't even use words, they just simulate some sounds probably taken from the animal communication vocabulary. That makes understanding much more easy, this is pure expression, coming directly from one's guts. Finally we can "leave the mind behind" [Quote from Zin in another thread]. 

> Dr. E: ... of course the universe has humor. Are we not humorous? 
InkyPinkie: We are really humorous? When I look around the statement "we" seems pretty much exaggerated. As I wrote in another post in the same thread: People use humor as a help to survive, but when they are not in a threatening situation then they are extremely serious because they are more secure and must watch out with all their alertness to be able to defend themselves, there is no space for humor. Laughing is not an expression of humor, this is just the intention to release some tension, to be able to deal with a situation which is threatening the square mind with something absurd or irrational. 
We are the universe and only about ourselves we can make statements, but of course we like to know every thing and so we pretend something to give us the necessary good feeling of security, humor might help with this also. Better not to look that our universe is depending exclusively on our perception and limited to our interpretation.
Better not touching this subject, then the humor for sure will complete disappear and make place for defense and all the energy will go into aggression to eliminate everything and everybody who is against the established system of created worlds of images of humankind in general and groups and individuals specially.

> Dr. E: Are we not created by the universe?
InkyPinkie: How do we know? Again: Looking around one might come to the result that we are creating ourselves with every thing we posses and so might have also created ourselves from the beginning. We are the most subjective beings which exist, we exist exclusively out of our own interpretation and we manipulate ourselves and everyone and our surrounding out of this subjective perception with the only goal to proof our existence, to get as much confirmation for this out of the nothing blown up existence and to defend this created image of ourselves with the best tools we can get and we have successfully developed in generations... The thought that we are created by the universe is just an excuse not to look at ourselves to take responsibility for our creations, we can easily give the fault to the universe and go on with our childish games turning around ourselves, playing creator and victim at the same time. Genius!

> Dr. E: Thus humor is an integrated property/potential of the universe that has become revealed through man, ...
InkyPinkie: So if there arises a doubt about our identity or identification and manipulation games, then we can switch onto a higher level and integrate our property into the universe, like projecting it into the clouds and receiving an fabulous picture from ourselves. 

> Dr. E: ...and probably some other animals (orangutans have shown signs of humor).
InkyPinkie: Some other animals than humans? I must stand up and defend the orangutans, they are much nearer to the universe, much clearer, much cleaner and more direct in their expression and when they might pretend something then they have probably learned this from humans who were invading their territory. I wish I were an orangutan, then I could communicate with my fellow orangutans and must not sit here in front of a monitor with the desperate longing for some human contact!!